Stage 4, if I understand Kegan correctly, just means you have a system. Any system. It can be completely bogus. The Buddhist systems are completely bogus, imo.
Relatedly: you can never interpret data without making unboundedly many implicit ontological assumptions.
-
-
My understanding is that serious statisticians acknowledge this. Any statistical inference on unboundedly many “ceteris paribus” assumptions, most of which cannot be justified by data.
-
Failure to recognize this is one major underlying cause of the present replication crisis.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.