Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Meaningness's profile
David Chapman
David Chapman
David Chapman
@Meaningness

Tweets

David Chapman

@Meaningness

Better ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—around problems of meaning and meaninglessness; self and society; ethics, purpose, and value.

meaningness.com/about-my-sites
Joined September 2010

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 26 Apr 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      David Chapman Retweeted John Nerst

      I learned from this a new way of thinking about thinking, “cognitive decoupling,” and its role in disagreements.https://twitter.com/everytstudies/status/989544002511949825 …

      David Chapman added,

      John Nerst @everytstudies
      My Big Fat Postmortem of the spat between Sam Harris and Ezra Klein. http://www.everythingstudies.com/a-deep-dive-into-the-harris-klein-controversy …. #erisology #longreads
      Show this thread
      2 replies 10 retweets 64 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Welp Banana‏ @literalbanana 26 Apr 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness

      can you summarize the concept?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. José Luis Ricón (Artir)‏ @ArtirKel 26 Apr 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @literalbanana @Meaningness

      It sounds like a fancy way of saying 'talking past each other' @?)

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 26 Apr 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ArtirKel @literalbanana

      They were talking past each other, but the thesis is that they were doing so because one of them was decoupling (Harris) and the other wasn’t (Klein). cc: @everytstudies IOU: more tweets explaining this

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    5. Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST‏ @PereGrimmer 26 Apr 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @ArtirKel and

      1/From quick perusal, it looks like Keith Stanovich is one of several 90s alt-psychologists (along with Dan Coleman, etc.) who propounded a way of filling in the gaps of what Eysenck called "intelligence 2;" i.e., that portion of what we ordinarily call intelligence not captured

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST‏ @PereGrimmer 26 Apr 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @PereGrimmer @Meaningness and

      2/by "intelligence 3" (g). Stanovich identified a bunch of irrational ways of thought, in an Amos Tversky, and (per the reporting here) it's suggested by the work of Tetlock &c that having a high g might be necessary, but is not sufficient, to (i) avoid irrational thinking; nor,

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST‏ @PereGrimmer 26 Apr 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @PereGrimmer @Meaningness and

      3/(ii) relatedly, accurately evaluate how rational you've been. All well and good, though I'm not familiar with the empirics, and reading the description of Stanovich's work grated a little, as it seemed like he was hiding the ball as to the extent to which all general knowledge

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 26 Apr 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @PereGrimmer @ArtirKel and

      Ah, interesting, I hadn’t gone back to Stanovich at all, just assumed that the concept was being reported accurately in the blog posts.

      2:35 PM - 26 Apr 2018
      • 1 Like
      • Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST "Derek. JUST‏ @PereGrimmer 26 Apr 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @Meaningness @ArtirKel and

          Just to be clear, I haven't read his work in any depth, I just did a quick Google! My prior is to be suspicious of "g-factor isn't everything 90s popular psychologists," but he doesn't seem like an obvious crank.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 26 Apr 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @PereGrimmer @ArtirKel and

          I am sure you are shocked and saddened by yesterday’s revelations about Sternberg

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. 1 more reply

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info