Systematic rationality only works if you do limit inference, because nothing is really truly true. If you take true-enough-for-this-context as “truly true,” you infer way too much. If you take it as “false,” you can’t infer anything.
-
-
To summarize my understanding of
@everytstudies’ post in my own jargon: Klein and Harris would have had to have had the meta-rational discussion of what counts as relevant, and why, before getting into the object-level debate. And neither was willing or able to do so.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A thought I had on this specific part of your post - the last public intellectual I can think of who masterfully blended low-decoupled and high-decoupled cognitive approaches in analysis was Michel Foucault. I get why you referred to him in an article as a master of rationalism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.