This distinction doesn't seem to track common usage: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=I+think+they+will+win%2CI+believe+they+will+win&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2CI%20think%20they%20will%20win%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CI%20believe%20they%20will%20win%3B%2Cc0 …
-
-
-
That’s interesting… those data are really odd, though. I agree it’s an empirical question that needs better support than “seems to me”, which is all I’ve got atm
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What's the context?
-
The Eggplant book, which leads to meta-rationality by looking at understandings of truth and beliefhttps://meaningness.com/eggplant
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is brilliant
-
Thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
no point in believing in something that isn't counterfactual
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe I have more thumbs than the average human.
-
A surprising coincidence—so do I!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Levi-Strauss--Original categories in a culture construct difference & sameness, in-groups, out-groups, ritual tasks, & even ambiguity. Categories underlie rational thought patterns, irrational thought patterns, lost thought patterns, and useful thought patterns.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.