Chalmers goes from being puzzled about subjectivity (1995) to qualified certainty about ontological dualism (1996). He makes it seem as though his only options are mind-body dualism or ontic monism, though acknowledges that he might have made the wrong choice between the two.
They were desperate to change their subject of conversation right then, because their alliance with AI had failed a few years earlier, and they’d run out of things to talk about. Chalmers stepped boldly into a void. Huge sigh of relief.
-
-
That one has been talked to death, so if you can think of any new topic, you can be a famous hero.
-
Dualism wasn’t new, obvs, it’s just no one had pretended to believe it for a century. Maybe you should pivot on your reincarnation book. Pitch rebirth as a serious theory to philosophers, and fame awaits!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.