@Meaningness What do you think of Drakar Tulku's critiques of Mipham?
I don’t know the details. Generally, the Geluk interpretation aims at preserving theocratic power via the Two Truths doctrine, whereas the Nyingma tend to dissolve that, potentially empowering non-monastic yogis and lay people.
-
-
This is about that debate in general, although it doesn’t mention Mipham as far as I remember:https://vividness.live/2015/11/27/emptiness-form-and-dzogchen-ethics/ …
-
Oh, actually my discussion does mention Mipham; and this is the key point in his arguments with Gelukpas (probably including Drakar Tulku, but I don’t remember that for sure):pic.twitter.com/RM9j1wMqw7
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.