Important point… And also, if you try to specify clearly what “mechanical” means, you’ll probably find that the notion disintegrates. The intuition that reality is “mechanical, ultimately” can’t be made to work as one would like.https://twitter.com/everytstudies/status/976553333606486016 …
-
-
Replying to @robert_mariani
The inseparability of nebulosity and pattern
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @robert_mariani
I neither believe nor disbelieve… I don’t think that intuitive idea can be made coherent. (What does “exists” or “reality” mean? If there were an answer, one could have an opinion about mathematical Platonism… but I’ve never encountered a workable definition)
4:55 PM - 21 Mar 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.