AI doesn’t replicate. Having worked in the field, I can usually see why a paper’s result is nonsense, but the public can’t, and many researchers can’t.https://twitter.com/stephaniemlee/status/964612382650646529 …
-
Show this thread
-
I’ve been skeptical about DL results because 25 years ago I reran the key experiments that were hyped as showing backprop (the underlying tech) was incredible. In each case I found that the researchers were fooling themselves. Not deliberate fraud, but sloppy work.
3 replies 2 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @chagmed
Kinda, but a bit worse. More deliberate. Probably not outright fraud, but a pervasive suspension of disbelief, and a promotion of giddy hope and hype that (I suspect) masks anxiety that it’s mostly smoke and mirrors.
4:37 PM - 16 Feb 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.