He's the @Meaningness of the normies.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev @Meaningness
I think he is attempting to do the same thing but fails and sides with eternalism
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @turrible_tao @St_Rev
Yeah, he does seem to be an eternalist, although sort of vague about what flavor
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Reformed Jungian Catholic, basically. Endorses an ontologically cleansed transcendental God to build convergence of purposes for enabling inner individual and social accountability.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Well, there’s an awful lot of seemingly-incompatible ideological systems combined in his presentations. What I want to understand is whether he attempts to reconcile them, or just uses different parts of them to view different aspects of reality, without attempting a synthesis?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I think he is a pragmatist, not a philosopher, and mostly busy with politics these days.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
That seems right!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
On a deeper level, Peterson may have a similar project as you: finding a sustainable mode of existence in the present age, but starting not from Buddhism but Catholicism, and with a greater focus on societal and relationship dynamics rather than the individual.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @Meaningness and
1. JBP is reviving an interest in foundational myths and rituals. 2. He points out that the biological world has organized itself according to hierarchies. 3. He is pro-science. These are compatible with Tantra.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatthausAnsatz @Meaningness and
JBP prays to Logos, and he seems to be way more grumpy than permissible for Tantrika.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.