it reminds me a lot of when SSC said "hey feminism kind of fucked me up maybe?" and every single econ blogger and news site put him on blast and had weird novel "uh actually thats dumb ssc why dont you just do this obvious thing that I think" and got super weird abt it
Oh! Yes, that should have been obvious; I feel stupid! The last part of Meaningness is supposed to do the social and interpersonal stuff. So far there’s mostly just the preliminary history, and that’s wildly incomplete, but the intention is announced…
-
-
Peterson thinks that he has found a solution for the interpersonal issues, that they are even more important than individual issues, and that a certain degree of eternalism is required for that. Also, he has a family and children, which influences his thinking about adulthood.
-
Does he have a clear statement of the proposed solution somewhere? I agree interpersonal is more important; that’s implied by my interactionism. Which is the basis for my critique of Jung (in https://buddhism-for-vampires.com/romancing-the-shadow … )
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.