I want to agree with this; but a little knowledge of stats can be worse than none. (Whereas trig is just a painful waste of time.) Can the intro course explain its own limits, and the dangers of misuse?https://twitter.com/jessesingal/status/951282864498372608 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @tehgeekmeister
Yes… there’s still some proofs in high school geometry, I believe, but no real explanation of what a proof is and why you should care, so I suspect it’s totally forgotten at the end of the year
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
This. The significance and nature of proofs is not taught at school, and mostly not even understood by the teachers, because they don't understand the concept of epistemology.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Right… and, unfortunately, I don’t think the MIT professors I had as a math undergraduate understood the issues involved at all well either. Anyway, were unwilling to discuss them!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
And then you ran into the
@rodneyabrooks and he irrevocably burned your brain because you had no epistemological defenses against his embodimentalism and you despaired and because a Buddhist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @puellavulnerata and
Just for the historical record, Phil Agre and I got embodiment from Lucy Suchman and Hubert Dreyfus. Rod came to it independently at the same time (as did Leslie Kaelbling & Stan Rosenschein).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @Plinz and
But “embodiment” mostly misses the point anyway. See this, from 1986:https://meaningness.com/metablog/abstract-emergent …
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
And this on the history of the ideas:https://meaningness.com/metablog/ken-wilber-boomeritis-artificial-intelligence#AI …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.