how cleverly do you have to go about applying force before it ceases to be brute?
-
-
Replying to @admittedlyhuman @shlevy
42.73. (I don’t know what you are asking?)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @admittedlyhuman
Was AlphaGo's success solely a function of compute resources/time or were those resources used especially well?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @shlevy @admittedlyhuman
Isn’t the supposedly exciting thing about AlphaZero (and, to a lesser extent AlphaGo) that they *don’t* rely on human cleverness?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @admittedlyhuman
No one's expecting cleverness to be unnecessary to *build* the thing...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @shlevy @admittedlyhuman
If AlphaGo were presented as an incremental engineering result in function approximation methods, no one would have been interested. The hype is that it’s a breakthrough in modeling human intuition.
5 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @admittedlyhuman
I've literally never heard anyone claim it's modelling human intuition... But I've no claim to a representative bubble.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @shlevy @admittedlyhuman
“About 43,400 results” https://www.google.com/search?q=alphago+intuition&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-ab …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
The idea that alphago mimics human intuition is, being extraordinarily charitable, so premature as to undermine credibility.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
My take is that this delusion is the only reason anyone outside a handful of geeks thinks AlphaGo is interesting.
-
-
This delusion is actively encouraged by various groups who have a vested interest in deceiving other groups about it.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.