Non-equilibrium thermo is a classic crank trap. Sounds like it explains everything, but there’s basically nothing there
-
-
Oh, totally, yeah! I’m offensively skeptical about Bayesianism as a general framework. (Good for some things ofc.)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @Collinsjo12 and
I’m even more skeptical about non-eq thermo as an alternative tho. (But willing to have my mind changed…)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Intuition probably can't be systematized, though
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Right—no overarching framework, just heuristics
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Collinsjo12 @garybasin
I’m not sure what you mean by “intuition”—I find the word unhelpfully vague…
12:44 PM - 7 Nov 2017
1 reply
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.