Falsificationism falsifies itself: it is a theory scientists refuse to abandon despite mountains of observations that falsify it
-
-
and are, empirically, not well-described by falsificationism.
-
isn't it driven by "weight of evidence" in some sense? Don't you think any formalism ever captures this reasonably well?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.