Falsificationism falsifies itself: it is a theory scientists refuse to abandon despite mountains of observations that falsify it
Every science counts. There is no theory (so far as I know) that does not have counterexamples. That doesn’t mean they are wrong!
-
-
Well, I would rather say "wrong" in the sense of not matching observations. I don't fully buy the idea that a model can be wrong, tbh.
-
Would you defend phlogiston?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
QFT? Does it make any false predictions that do not match observation?
-
It’s incompatible with general relativity, I gather. (That’s currently a problem at the level of theory rather than observation, though.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.