"Postmodernism for rationalists" by @rwuio — exceptionally clear explanation! https://palegreendot.net/assets/2017-10-09/postmodernism_for_rationalists.pdf … 
@xuenay
-
-
Metamodernism is not pomo rebranded, I think. It does correct the nihilistic and Idealistic errors.https://meaningness.com/fluid-culture
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
More like the synthesis of the best of Mo and Pomo.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That’s the starting point… but to do that, you have to create something quite different from both, not just mix the best bits of each
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @everytstudies and
There was an early “oscillation” theory of metamodernism that missed this point. Current versions, eg
@SethAbramson ‘s, are transformational1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @everytstudies and
What do you mean by transformational?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @suspendedreason @everytstudies and
I.e. not just an integration of parts
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @everytstudies and
FWIW I think oscillation was a decent predecessor to the kind of double consciousness metamod entails, where one both inhabits...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @suspendedreason @Meaningness and
...a subjectivity and also is aware of its inherent limitations (cf romantic irony http://secondbalcony.tumblr.com/post/166117738573/if-they-did-one-of-those-edge-dot-org-questions-of … )
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
“simultaneously inside and outside of a worldview”—I like that!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.