Yeah, that’s really great. Fascinating both for its own sake and as nice examples of how science actually gets done: improvisationally!
Yup! Heidegger is similarly obscure cuz trying not to use standard philosophical vocabulary, which imports unwanted metaphysical assumptions
-
-
It’s a trade-off against accessibility though. The little ethno I learned was from Lucy Suchman, who wrote (and spoke) more clearly/normally
-
I agree, also her work applied EM to a domain in CogSci/HCI which helps, whereas Garfinkel is always pushing towards something foundational
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.