The HIVs are not unrelated.
At this point in the story (which has grown to book length unfortunately) I’ve already seen off rationalism, so the more interesting >
-
-
> question is: how *should* we understand “‘HIV causes AIDS’ is true”? One good feature of the example is that it’s true *importantly*
-
Has potential, waiting to see what you do with it. Don't let me distract you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.