of “the object” (whether a jam jar or pulsar). Rather, perception is the *active process* of separating things into objects and categories.
on the basis of enormous amounts of pretheoretical observational data. But this is not actually possible. Here they want to both claim >
-
-
strong confirmation of their theoretical framework based on n=1 observation, and to make strong metaphysical points about perception&objects
-
while simultaneously pretending they aren’t doing that. I suspect this contradiction can be resolved via separating the rational & metarat
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.