interpret the Fourier signal peak *as* a pulsar, although in material fact it was just a dot crawling upward on the oscilloscope.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
OK good I was assuming something like that, but wasn't sure!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Meaningness
That act of interpretation is prob the key thing I'm interested in here (and used to think about specifically in context of radio pulsars)..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket @Meaningness
...it's interesting because as a theorist you never know the whole pipeline from observational mess to neat theory...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket @Meaningness
...I assumed *someone* studied this but didn't know who.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket
Astonishing coincidence that you, as a scientist in precisely this field, would have formed an interest in ethno b4 knowing of this study!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
Yes it's odd! I wasn't so much interested in the phenomenological side then as I am now (tho was a bit), more like the data pipeline...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket @Meaningness
i.e. starting from messy oscilloscope signals and then correcting for movement of earth, various noise sources etc...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The upshot of the paper is buried in footnote 28 and in the last two paragraphs of Appendix 5 (a characteristically Garfinkelian move)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.