> because it was extremely unclear how pulsars could work, and the hope was optical observation would constrain that. Was a race to find one
(They credit this to Maurice Merleau-Ponty, who was the foremost phenomenologist of perception. His work is interesting but difficult)
-
-
More mess :) Also, interesting to see how messy the notebook is—lots of crossed-out stuff, post hoc additions, etc (cc:
@sarahdoingthing )pic.twitter.com/GiPEp2258d
-
Point here is NOT that they falsified anything, or that it should be otherwise, but that scientific rationality DEPENDS ON and EMERGES FROM
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Backing up slightly, what's with the long hyphenated phrases? E.g. 'the-astronomical-analyzability-of-the-pulsar-again'
-
Garfinkel was a major weirdo, & also suffered from the Continental delusion that writing in weird ways would shake people out of fixed ideas
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.