Yeah, that’s why I’m not doing it today! It was an unusually long-lived outrage. I thought this insightful: https://twitter.com/alicemazzy/status/895534653842620416 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
I have partial tritanopia (can see all colors but dimly), so see the dress as blue & gold, which is not on the list of options,
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
but is objectively accurate if you isolate color patches and look at the pixel values.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
I saw it as blue and gold, and my color vision is fine!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
Ok n=3 is enough to conclude autism causes objective color perception. (Maybe
@slatestarcodex would like to investigate?)1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
"strength of categorical perception of color did not differ for the two groups" (ASD/non-ASD) http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/761680/3/Sowden%202008%20COLOR%20AUTISM%20JADD.pdf …
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
“Beautiful Theory Ruined By Tedious Data (N=20)” But it did find significant differences, interestingly. Didn’t test this particular effect.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
another one that shows worse category perception (and also better memory) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750946707000451 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Interesting… but subject population is *rather* different from my n=3:pic.twitter.com/jFMuvIkgIu
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
it would be an interesting hypothesis to propose early-life delay in category distinction followed by later-life improvement
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I will leave @slatestarcodex out of further discussion; don’t want to spam him
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.