sorry for noob questions, but does kegan's theory have tests that distinguish between people at different stages with
-
-
Replying to @alexeyguzey @Malcolm_Ocean
(1) good reliability and (2) predictive power over something interesting? (
@Meaningness?)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
inter-rater reliability leaves something to be desired, I believe, but it's not atrocious
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I recently dug into the detailed research report and it sucks. His own research group’s anyway. There’s been follow-up by other groups, who
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @garybasin and
did get get similar results, but overall the quality of science is disappointing. I’m enthusiastic about it as a heuristic framework, but >
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @garybasin and
it has to be considered tentative/preliminary/speculative as science. The Kohlberg stuff looks pretty solid however, and is closely related
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
And Kegan is sort of Kohlberg + [Subject Object ness]. It's an interesting question how one might test the SO concept itself!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean @Meaningness and
I tried to kind of abstract it out here:http://malcolmocean.com/2014/10/subject-object-notation/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean @Meaningness and
Questions include: • is S-O Notation a good way to describe ppl's mental relationships? • does it apply to Kohlberg stages etc?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean @Meaningness and
+Qs • what else does S-O notation apply to? • what factors nurture (/block) S-O shifts? • how can you tell if something has S-O structure?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Great questions!!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.