Alexey also asked for "(2) predictive power over something interesting?" I don't know any stats, but I haven't looked. Anyone else?
-
-
There’s some studies in the management literature, which is where most of the post-1990 research has been done. I can probably find…
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean and
however, my subjective assessment is that the quality of the research is low, so I think it’s probably not worth reading
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean and
they claim to find high correlation of Kegan-type stage assessment with management ability. But they are selling exec development services.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean and
This is a good 2011 review article on stage 5 cognition: https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/37040/Eeva%20Kallio_thpsycPRE_PRINT.pdf?sequence=1 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean and
Cook-Greuter explaining why her thing is way better than Kegan’s: http://www.cook-greuter.com/Comparison%20S-O%20interview%20and%20LDP.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean and
“Its reliability and validity has been extensively tested by leading universities in Europe and the USA since 1970” http://www.clevelandconsultinggroup.com/articles/leadership-development-profile.php …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean and
I dug into that claim and was disappointed… there’s a Torbert review article that tries to back it up and is super lame. Not finding it now
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean and
Ah, I’ve found a different Torbert review article that is somewhat less lame: http://www.williamrtorbert.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DevMeasuresCompared1.pdf … Still frustratingly hand-wavey I find
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean and
More Torbert. Unfortunately adds up to “science is bad if it doesn’t validate our ideas.” (Slight caricature, but…) http://integral-review.org/documents/Torbert,%20Listening%20into%20the%20Dark,%20Vol.%209,%20No.%202.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I’m frustrated by quality of science on this stuff, because I think it’s *probably* right, and important, & so should be tested rigorously.
-
-
Totally with you. And like, "right" not in the sense of "perfect", but in the provisional still-to-be-honed sense that science always has.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yup! … people working in this field seem to have an attitude of “we’re under pressure to do these stupid scientific studies, so we will, but
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.