5/ It strikes me as a giant, self-reinforcing structure designed to justify not taking action, not producing, not finding real bottleneck
-
-
Replying to @fortelabs
5a: Constant tradeoff between process-level throughput vs object-level throughput.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean @fortelabs
5b: OL throughput necessary for good feedback ∴ necessary for improvement, and also scary if fear of failure or if goals are conflicted
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean
What is the object you're referring to? The objective (vs. process)?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fortelabs
Yeah. eg I asked
@Meaningness about site tech (hover-glossary) & he said he had to keep from tweaking it (PL) instead of writing (OL)1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean @fortelabs
Fortunately web tech maintenance is only maybe 10% of total effort. That might be 10% too much, though!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @fortelabs
The other option is to actually form an OL project around the system. eg my livelihood comes from https://complice.co , which I also use.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean @fortelabs
I have thought about making a business out of book-on-the-web tools.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Chicken & egg: are there so few hypertext books because no tools to create them, or are there no tools because no one wants hypertext books?
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
I think hypertext has cool potential for writing the big picture without that violence you were talking about. But traditional publishing
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, exactly, that’s why I chose to make Meaningness hypertext. It’s too big and complicated to be a conventional book (paper or e).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.