I consider it wiser to acknowledge the idea of God consciously. If not, something else is made God, usually something quite inappropiate...
-
-
-
Replying to @BoringJedi @jordanbpeterson
from what book is this? If you don't mind
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @alsayeghkn @jordanbpeterson
That book basically resolves the discussion between Jordan and Sam Harris. Too bad
@Meaningness isn't followed more!1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BoringJedi @alsayeghkn and
Interesting. Buddhism acknowledges impermanence, crudely speaking, change, as the only eternal factor.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hitchpster @BoringJedi and
But in a way he's wrong too. Cosmology does not deal with eternities, just ridiculously long periods of time.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @hitchpster @BoringJedi and
It escapes eternalism by the understanding of time as a 4th dimension of spacetime, in which the arrow of time is a thermodynamic illusion.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @hitchpster @BoringJedi and
Just to clarify, “eternalism” in _Meaningness_ doesn’t have much to do with eternity; it means “insisting that meanings are fixed.”
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
This was a probably-unfortunate choice of terms (derived, actually, from Buddhism), but I don’t know of a better alternative.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @hitchpster and
Oh what I would give 2get a couple of hours of open & engaged Jesus / God conversations w/ Jordan &
@PeterRollins ! https://peterrollins.com/#about-section0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.