These are all true of chess, too, right?
I don’t know of a reason to believe that its pattern matching is “intuitive” or “similar to human”?
-
-
"Intuitive" in that the trained value network can't be described with any explicit or crisp rules, anymore than human could give a fully
-
satisfactory explanation to why some moves feel good - they just do, based on pattern recognition built up from countless previous games.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.