Why AlphaGo is uninteresting. Same observation Phil Agre and I made in mid-80s! https://medium.com/@karpathy/alphago-in-context-c47718cb95a5 … by Andrej Karpathy 
@xuenaypic.twitter.com/VzKzlegtxJ
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
read an article that claimed deep learning's ability to generalize is an accident of stocastic gradient decent, so maybe yes :)
I think I may have seen the same article! I didn’t really understand it, tbh; but don’t think the author did either :)
:) I don’t know… I don’t recall hearing of one. Although… $GOOG maybe? Alphabet is claiming to be a fund, sorta, now.
Do you see current AI as missing some vital insight, or as on the right track but likely to see gradual progress not sudden imminent boom?
I think current approaches are not on the path to human-level general intelligence. (But, I might be wrong!)
Nick Bostrom makes that exact point in "Superintelligence" (which I thought was terrible) calling it "AI winter" (it happens in cycles).
This highlights the fact that humans don't reason in the way we tend to think we do. We employ very flawed but effective heuristics.
has anybody shown a form of incompleteness for AI? It seems there could be a formal limit to what AI is capable of.
There were many super smart people working on it in the 80s, and we found a lot of dead ends. The current wave might learn from history…
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.