Hate to say it but the Conceptual Penis paper is a damp squib. Pay to pay journal with a sketchy editor and bogus 'reviewers'.
So, turns out there’s quite a lot of discussion of this in the blogosphere and on twitter…
-
-
And after reading the top five posts, I think the skeptics fucked up pretty badly. Wasted opportunity and makes them look bad.
-
I should have done more diligence on this before tweeting about it, and feel stupid myself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.