Hate to say it but the Conceptual Penis paper is a damp squib. Pay to pay journal with a sketchy editor and bogus 'reviewers'.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
I’m slightly aggrieved by the authors’ failure on this. It’s persistently bugging me. Why put so much effort into a misfire? Grump grump.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TyphonBaalAmmon @St_Rev
I don’t know anything about them… Boghossian appears to be an A-list philosopher, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s not an idiot
9:41 AM - 21 May 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.