Hate to say it but the Conceptual Penis paper is a damp squib. Pay to pay journal with a sketchy editor and bogus 'reviewers'.
I’m slightly aggrieved by the authors’ failure on this. It’s persistently bugging me. Why put so much effort into a misfire? Grump grump.
-
-
the fun answer would be "false flag!" but I don't really believe that.
-
less fun but more likely: they really expected it would get into the better journal they tried first, and then they were in salvage mode
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Because they're idiots ?
-
I don’t know anything about them… Boghossian appears to be an A-list philosopher, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s not an idiot
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.