Three weeks between 'received' and 'accepted' is a big clue.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev @Meaningness
Reviewing editor is real but his vita is...strange. https://www.hud.ac.uk/ourstaff/profile/index.php?staffid=767 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
Jeeeebuz! And I thought *my* publication record was eclectic. Either he’s a genius, or most of these are fake…
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
“Fake” in the sense of no actual content. Takes one to know one, maybe?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
Can’t help noticing the word “Rotherham” in there…. in the context of “Mainstream Construction of English Muslims”….
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @St_Rev
He was there 2008-9 just before the scandal broke into public in a big way:pic.twitter.com/yadKOZLSjN
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
His 2007 publications were all on “English Muslims are oppressed” http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/16822/ and then there is a gap to 2010. Bad timing dude
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @St_Rev @Meaningness
So we'll just go with 'maybe cuts a few corners sometimes'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, from 2010, his publications are all over everything. Apparently has no actual research interests/agenda; >
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
looks like opportunistic publishing in any journal that will accept a dashed-off opinion piece. So, you’re likely right about his journal!
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
