Hmm, well, good question. Depends on what theory you apply, I guess! From a traditional point of view, there’s a metaphysical explanation >
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @maggie_truelove
> which I’m guessing you wouldn’t find persuasive or interesting. From a modern point of view, it’s an empirical question, and uncertain.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @maggie_truelove
Since we don’t have a detailed and verified explanation for how yidams work, it’s hard to be sure.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @maggie_truelove
Basically, “Tiffany” lacks most of the necessary characteristics (e.g seriousness/awe, depth of symbolism, alienness, intensity)?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Meaningness @maggie_truelove
Relevant, from @joffe_p ’s post today (https://perfumedskull.com/2017/05/07/to-see-is-to-call-tantric-visualization-summoning-spirits-and-the-mind-as-a-petting-zoo/ …):pic.twitter.com/NOVqwfVg3c
9:15 PM - 7 May 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.