Point is that pomo *is* sterile. Nihilistic. From lit crit pov, big Q is how to create after meta-narrative collapsed
-
-
As I said, I think the story is somewhat off because pomo’s analysis is off. But basically correct:
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Creation is necessarily historically situated, collaborative, improvisational, paradoxical, appreciative, engaged
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
So it *doesn’t* derive from an eternalistic meta-narrative; it arises spontaneously from appreciation of nebulosity
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think all this is what he’s trying to wave at with “generative”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
Maybe? That loops back to the insincerity of the argument. "Milo is ungenerative but my hypothetical thing will be."
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
"Frog/Content" Twitter is extremely generative, in that sense, but he apparently finds no reason to engage with that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TristanSevers @St_Rev
He *is* engaging with it! That’s what this article is… engagement… no?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
He picks out one (very aptly described as sterile) shock jock & synecdoches the whole scene through them...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
...then casts it all as but a pale prefiguring of his hypothetical Generative alt-left.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I’m not seeing what you are seeing. He doesn’t use word “sterile” at all, & acknowledges alt-right metamodern tactics
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
Yeah, I brought up sterile. He appears to use generative in contrast to "ephemeral" instead, which also seems wrong.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.