The people who skip on @Meaningness for years because at first glance it kinda looks like an attempt at a grand eternalist theory of meaning
Any advice/thoughts about how I could make it more obvious that it’s not? (I’m aware of the problem, but not sure how to fix
-
-
make top level organization less logical/hierarchical, salt meaty bits of example in the flow, even fiction?
-
would also help point out more clearly and repeatedly that this is at best a path, not "all the answers"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.