Is it just me, or is Heidegger's division of being into objects, tools, and people dumb? Three separate modes seems metaphysically bulky
-
-
(2) the purposes to which he puts his ontology are completely different from the analytical ones, so the criteria >
-
for judging the categories also have to be entirely dissimilar
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.