@Meaningness broadly speaking, the reason to want a blockchain is because you want a trust-less payments network
-
-
Replying to @bitemyapp @Meaningness
however, if you look at how email deals with spam, you'll see trust and fiefs are a huge part of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @Meaningness
accordingly, pitch out the trust-less constraint (makes things inefficient & difficult)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @Meaningness
transaction throughput for most blockchain designs is abysmal.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bitemyapp @Meaningness
we trust a single all powerful entity for our social network (Twitter), I'm proposing a move back to email's established model
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
agreed although one caveat is that apparently anti-spam does depend on panoptic access by the big players. gmail sees everything.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @bitemyapp @Meaningness
notion is to permit pseudonymous and encrypted exchange, but not anonymous. Then to deal with the oligarchy...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @Meaningness
my thinking was to provide a prebaked fief server and to make rake part of running a fief, that is, it should be nominally
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
this was the way I was thinking about it. probably I stole the idea from you tho
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Not sure, feel like we've discussed this before but I'm a bit dotty after 2.5 years working the same book.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.