seems a bit of contradiction in that Option 2 people are both simultaneously lauded and criticized 1/2
-
-
Replying to @johanatan @jdegoes
Yes, I can see how that could be confusing… this is descriptive, not evaluative. “What is the source of the conflict?” >
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @jdegoes
I think the criticism is difficult to support. Typically ppl in that category believe in a much larger framework. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
2/2 and the reproductive issues are only a small part of that. Hard to make it the focal point examining entire lives.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johanatan @jdegoes
In the 1980s, particularly, reproductive issues were the primary locus of disagreement, explicitly.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @jdegoes
yes, but my point is that for people in that category kindness, honesty, integrity, humility, etc etc= more important
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
it's not like they sat down and conspired to raise large families as a means of keeping follower counts high 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
i.e., the reproductive stance is a side-effect of a larger moral framework and belief system-- not the focal point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johanatan
Well, the argument is that this is partly unconscious—although conservatives do explicitly express a desire for larger families.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The story draws on @JasonWeeden ’s work, which in turn draws on evolutionary psychology, which some may find unconvincing…
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.