@abramdemski Thanks! To be honest, it’s probably more technical than I would want to read at the moment. Glad you are working on it though!
Yes… but are there any cases in which it’s practical? If not, then may be interesting as logic, but not AI.
-
-
Theoretical results don't instantly jump to practical applicability. Takes time.
-
Yes; but to be interested, has to be some reason to think it may be practical someday.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Besides... Probability theory isn't poly time. Logic isn't poly time. Why should the unifying theory be poly time?
-
If it’s AI, I may be interested now. If it’s logic, I’ll wait until logicians tell me it’s a result. Not holding my breath!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
pshhh, lots of ai is exp. in worst case. But yeah, the results in the paper are more like logic in that sense.
-
Like a logic of boundedly-rational probability-like beliefs. Nonpoly, but more bounded than probability theory
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.