I agree, @Meaningness: "learning" is missing; there's no algorithm for it. Because code for "creativity" not known.https://twitter.com/NautilusMag/status/774940712525717506 …
-
-
Replying to @ToKTeacher
.
@Meaningness & it can't be "statistical" as you say: "people often learn from a single example". Yes: they *conjecture* truth & criticise.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ToKTeacher
.
@Meaningness This, by@DavidDeutschOxf is an important essay on all this: https://aeon.co/essays/how-close-are-we-to-creating-artificial-intelligence … (induction/stats can't be a way forward).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ToKTeacher @DavidDeutschOxf
Thanks, good article, I mostly agree with it!
10:18 PM - 12 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.