About once a week, I think "I really ought to verify that Haskell is trivial." But because it almost certainly is, it's worth 15 mins max.
> having a simple syntax makes it more readily available and then I’d use it often.
-
-
The other thing is “category theory” which seems in practice to be “monads,” which are “trivial” in some relevant sense.
-
What I was implicitly asking is: is there some “category theory” in Haskell that’s actually useful and interesting.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.