Korzybski coined the phrase, but was cracked, and his discussion veers between trivial and insane
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Yudkowski has a whole “sequence” that is supposedly about it, but never does more than mention it in passing (three time total, by my count)
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
To the slight extent that I can guess what Yudkowski was thinking, it’s that the map should be as nearly as poss isomorphic to the territory
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
… and the “good idea in the vicinity” is almost exactly the opposite: understanding the map/territory relationship as isomorphism is wrong
6 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
I would like to explain the nearby good idea to rationalists, but they are likely to say “isn’t this just ‘the map is not the territory’?”
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
This is always the problem with explaining things to rationalists: they are super-resistant to admitting their ideas are incoherent.
4 replies 3 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
I want to find inconsistencies in my ideas so I can improve them, but I have no idea (yet) what your angle is re: map/territory
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @niftierideology
Will probably have to be a long and difficult post. Attempt in a tweet:
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @niftierideology
Representation and reality are sufficiently dissimilar in kind that the ideal of isomorphism is irrelevant & misleading.
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @niftierideology
Yes, I've notes for an essay about this, but hope you'll write it instead The crux:pic.twitter.com/OhMgMjA91I
3 replies 2 retweets 11 likes
This is really good, and I hope YOU write it! So I can link yours instead of writing it :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.