Yudkowski has a whole “sequence” that is supposedly about it, but never does more than mention it in passing (three time total, by my count)
What I want is to find a clear, concise explanation, so I can explain why it’s wrong, and the nearby view that is right.
-
-
yeah, I just realized that what I said was a bit muddy, but I think that I have a relatively clear one? Give me a moment
-
I do actually understand that view, thanks! It’s just that I can’t find a standard text that’s recent and clear.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.