does anyone really think the class "humans" can have a coherent anything, much less coherent extrapolated volition
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana
Tacit assumption of rationalism is that humans are rational in their essence and only contingently irrational due to
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @literalbanana
accident of running on lousy hardware. We are shadows of our Platonic Ideal selves, who have tidy mathematical definitions.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @literalbanana
Benevolent AI could easily see which Ideal we each correspond to, and replace the corrupt wetware with that.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
not multiple incompatible ones for each person, much less different people?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @literalbanana
Well, definitely not multiple per person; rationalism tacitly or explicitly assumes personal coherence (modulo wetware)!
8:43 AM - 17 Jun 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.