A great philosopher is someone who is wrong in a very interesting way.
and he’s upfront about the motivation: he wants to rescue positivism, but he also recognizes that’s impossible.
-
-
it’s an emotionally powerful essay, which is part of its appeal, but the emotions are inevitably conflicted:
-
he knows he can’t get what he wants. He describes his conclusions as “sad” and “horrible”
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.