Rambling & technical, but imo accurate. TL;DR: it’s unboundedly complicated & sometimes irreducibly ambiguous. https://twitter.com/joXn/status/741286764799660032 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Meaningness
and how do you support “unboundedly complicated & irreducibly ambiguous” without an analysis that rambles technically? …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn @Meaningness
if you could do an analysis that was concise and untechnical and yet convincing, you’d kind of have falsified your assertion
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn @Meaningness
which is why “can’t you just sᴀʏ what you ᴍᴇᴀɴ in ᴘʟᴀɪɴ ʟᴀɴɢᴜᴀɢᴇ‽” is such a frustrating objection at times
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
Yes; but on the other hand, some people try hard to be clear, and some try hard to sound high-status by obfuscating, and some >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
> don’t recognize the difference or don’t care or whatever. I think there’s a moral and practical imperative to be >
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @joXn
> as clear as possible (and also to avoid oversimplification) which is always a balancing act
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.