@Meaningness Yes, he has. Not sure how to assign credit on that one.
-
-
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch Maybe this is the “whatever became of…” phenomenon—coverage rekindling interest in the topic after LW & NRx have both faded1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @GrumplessGrinch
Or maybe finally the sociopath has moved in to monetize the mops, which the geeks failed to do :-) http://meaningness.com/metablog/geeks-mops-sociopaths …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
I get your point, but don't think sociopath is accurate. And not a fan of its weaponization.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
the implication that sociopaths can't be creative is weird.
@Meaningness1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @GrumplessGrinch
sociopaths have become the faceless evil other for societal, group problems.
@Meaningness2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bitemyapp @GrumplessGrinch
it's getting old, and I say that as someone who has had scary encounters with psychopaths in the past.
@Meaningness1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @GrumplessGrinch
I love
@Meaningness's articles, usually, but I do not when he mimics Rao's sociopath-fetishism.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bitemyapp @GrumplessGrinch
I think, now you both point it out, that this was a mistake!
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
I do not think you were wrong about the cultural opportunism, but you need to take vgr far less seriously.
@GrumplessGrinch1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
In his defense, he did eventually say that he didn’t mean “sociopath” clinically either. But your point stands.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.