@Meaningness He has contributed much less, I think.
-
-
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch I haven’t read the book, but I expect you are right!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@GrumplessGrinch However, as Nostalgebrist points out, at minimum he’s provoked a lot of pretty interesting conversation.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Yes, he has. Not sure how to assign credit on that one.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch Maybe this is the “whatever became of…” phenomenon—coverage rekindling interest in the topic after LW & NRx have both faded1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @GrumplessGrinch
Or maybe finally the sociopath has moved in to monetize the mops, which the geeks failed to do :-) http://meaningness.com/metablog/geeks-mops-sociopaths …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
I get your point, but don't think sociopath is accurate. And not a fan of its weaponization.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Which isn't to say he isn't a dick (he is), just not abnormally so.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
Agreed (at least I assume you are right; I don’t know anything about him).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Weakly in my defense, I was using “sociopath” in a specific semi-metaphorical sense; in that essay it wasn’t meant as a >
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @GrumplessGrinch
accurate usage of the technical term from psychopathology. This is potentially confusing and harmful, of course.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.