This might be called a “post-rationalist manifesto.” It does have political implications.http://meaningness.com/metablog/stem-fluidity-bridge …
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness thanks, I really liked this. Looking back, I get your critique of LW rationality a bit more.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
Frame Of Stack Retweeted Not Of Suns
Frame Of Stack added,
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @FrameOfStack
@FrameOfStack@simplic10@NotOfSuns Same insight, yes!2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@FrameOfStack@simplic10@NotOfSuns what is the minimum timeframe for being a rationalist? i'm kind of late to that party2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @lunavis
@lunavis@FrameOfStack@simplic10@NotOfSuns This is an empirical question (not a definitional/a priori one) I think.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
@lunavis @FrameOfStack @simplic10 @NotOfSuns Apparently the data suggest “at least a decade” but I don’t know how solid the science is.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@lunavis@FrameOfStack@NotOfSuns (1) read HPMOR (2) transcend HPMOR0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.