@themattsimpson In reply to several tweets you made while I was in the shower: it seems our understandings of Pearl have converged!
@themattsimpson My remaining irritant is that the presentation is so complicated. Either there should be a short intuitive explanation, or >
-
-
@themattsimpson Oh, and of course the main irritation is the LW-ish crowd who think it’s an account of what causality *is*, >
-
@themattsimpson > rather than a way of testing an individual causal model in a set format.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@themattsimpson > there should be an explanation for why there is no short intuitive explanation, and I haven’t found either.
-
@themattsimpson I’ve avoided reading further because I’m afraid I’ll get sucked into sorting that out; would be time-consuming diversion
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.